Exact(1)
Because we were only interested in physicians and their specialties, we excluded all drugs prescribed by other professionals.
Similar(59)
For the quantitative component, there may be a survey response bias in that physicians who responded may be more interested in physician wellness or have more time to complete the survey.
For the quantitative component of the study, physicians who responded to the questionnaire may have been more interested in physician wellness or had more time to complete the survey.
There may also be a response bias in that physicians who completed our survey may have been more or less interested in physician wellness which was the focus of the study.
Because we were interested in physician care of children with medical problems requiring specialty care we excluded articles on dentistry, nursing, and primary care, acute illness (such as upper respiratory infections), immunizations, reproductive health and prenatal care.
A second way of approaching a residency decision is to ask if the specialties you're most interested in are physician-scientist "friendly".
We were particularly interested in understanding how physicians assessed the value of an HRQL application for their chronically ill geriatric patients.
While we were interested in primary care physicians who were enrolled in the OSA program, those who were not enrolled in the OSA program were still subject to new prescribing rules.
"For somebody who really likes science but is not interested in becoming a physician or working on the bench as a Ph.D. but is interested in working with people this is a great profession to choose".
He was not, however, interested in becoming a physician and chose instead to study the origin of disease without being involved in the experimental side of drug design and discovery.
We were most interested in examining individual physician participation in CCOP because of the significant variation that occurs in enrolling patients in cancer clinical trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com