Exact(60)
Originally, the key behavior of interest was whether a user might click on an online ad.
Of interest was whether any of the 3000 accessions had Ping16A_Stow and, if so, did they also have more mPings.
Of secondary interest was whether there were sequential effects such that postures adopted in preceding trials influenced postures in subsequent trials.
Of additional interest, was whether the existing skill level interacted with the environmental properties of the experimental tasks (varying indoor climbing routes).
But of greatest interest was whether the five-try haul revealed a new, much-needed attacking threat or was merely another glorious one-off?
Of particular interest was whether (i) mPing bursts could be detected in other accessions of wild and/or domesticated rice, (ii) the + 16 G/A Ping SNP and Ping16A_Stow could be detected in wild rice or first appeared in domesticated rice, and (iii) the presence of + 16 G/A Ping SNP and Ping16A_Stow correlated with higher mPing copy numbers.
Of interest was whether readers could monitor fiction for errors, in order to reduce suggestibility.
Of particular interest was whether museum visitors would spontaneously invoke evolutionary ideas.
The final question of interest was whether prequestions enhance the effects of retrieval practice.
Of interest was whether prior testing of related words primes false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm.
Of interest was whether older adults' robust knowledge bases would protect them from vulnerability to this illusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com