Fig. 3 Sample trial in the sexual-interest judgment task.
The average sexual-interest judgment was 0.161, which did not differ reliably from 0.0, the middle of the scale, t 397.2) = 1.475, ns, d = 0.15.
Male participants in a prior study reported their use of affect, clothing style, and attractiveness cues after completing the sexual-interest judgment task.
Fig. 2 Sample scenes presented in the sexual-interest judgment task that vary along four psychological dimensions of interest: woman's sexual interest, provocativeness of dress, and normative attractiveness, as well as sexual relevance of context.
This made it possible to obtain independent estimates of reliance on sexual interest, provocativeness of clothing style, attractiveness, and the sexual relevance of the context from participants' judgments on the sexual-interest judgment task.
To enhance our understanding of participants' awareness of their cue-utilization patterns, we asked participants to estimate their own cue utilizations after they completed the sexual-interest judgment task.
The audit found no criminal wrongdoing, although it concluded that Hunter had failed in his fiduciary obligations and had put personal and family gain ahead of union interests — judgments that he vehemently protested.
First, we examined the effect of trial-by-trial feedback on men's sexual-interest judgments (Treat et al., in press).
The extent to which pairwise cue combinations influence men's continuous sexual-interest judgments over and above the independent contributions of the cues to such judgments has been unknown, however.
Thus, we were unable to estimate the extent to which each participant relied independently on each of the four stimulus dimensions of primary psychological interest when making his sexual-interest judgments.
