An incredible atmosphere of interdisciplinary debate has been fostered.
Our interdisciplinary debate brought to light the proliferation of various terminologies across disciplines, including "political remittances," "intangible flows," "democratic diffusion," "transfers of norms," or "health transfers" that ultimately document the different facets of one core phenomenon: that of social remittances.
In particular, the interdisciplinary debate has led to three alternative forms of participation, potentially capable of subtracting the democratic political process from the negative effects produced both by generalised apathy and by the progressive success of the NIMBY syndrome.
The current, interdisciplinary debate over racial inequalities in health has revived controversy about the role of race in health-related sciences [1] [3].
In the interdisciplinary debate on NE, ethical issues concerning risks and benefits, fairness, justice, cognitive liberty, autonomy, authenticity, and personal identity are intensively discussed [ 27].
Recent suggestions that technological advances now allow us to decode criminal guilt from brain activity data have generated intensive interdisciplinary debate within the scientific community (Garland & Glimcher, 2006; Greely & Illes, 2007; Sip, Roepstorff, McGregor, & Frith, 2008; Wolpe, Foster, & Langleben, 2005).
This paper suggests that the idea of "nature" remains a thematic leitmotif within interdisciplinary debates because it provides a potential bridge between the natural sciences, the social sciences and the humanities.
In interdisciplinary debates on medical, social, and ethical implications of NE, aspects relating to addiction play a considerable role [ 10– 10].
The results give a possible explanation for the challenging interdisciplinary debates on health care financing and service provision.
In this study I examine stratification in knowledge production in a largely American interdisciplinary humanities debate called bioethics, focusing on the issue of the ethics of human genetic engineering.
The primary clues to these revisions come from a theory of reification proposed by the Hungarian socialist Georg Lukács in the 1920s and from interdisciplinary projects and debates conducted by members of the Institute of Social Research in the 1930s and 1940s.
