Sentence examples for intercept significantly from inspiring English sources

The Slaughter equation did not reveal an intercept significantly different from zero against estimated FM (figure 2D).

To determine whether the addition of a random intercept significantly improved the adjustment of the model, we used the test for maximum likelihood with an α < 0.05.

The specific hospital had a strong influence, perhaps driven by formulary guidelines, on the choice of amphotericin B formulation, as allowing each hospital to have its own intercept significantly improved model fit (P < 0.001).

ADP was considered to be accurate if the regression between body density and percent fat by HW and ADP did not have a slope significantly different from one and an intercept significantly different from zero.

A summary of the results is shown in table 3. Post hoc regression analysis revealed that the Goran as well as the Dezenberg equations did not reveal an intercept significantly different from zero (figure 2A, B).

In our study adopting the approach of Dezenberg et al we achieved good correlation with the intercept not significantly different from zero with Slaughter equations predicting %BF and FM in kilograms estimated by DEXA (figure 2D) however the regression analysis between predicted %BF and that estimated with DEXA shows an intercept significantly different from zero (figure 2C).

Log-log plots of pupal against adult horn length yielded a negative y-intercept significantly different from 0 (T49 = 4.38, p < 0.0001), further confirming that horn lengths changed from the pupal to the adult stage, but with a slope indistinguishable from 1 (Fig. 4C; T49 = 1.026; p = ns), indicating that this change was similar for all males regardless of their size.

This observation was backed up by regression analysis, which yielded a negative y-intercept significantly different from 0 (T32 = 18.95, p < 0.0001), confirming that horn lengths of at least some males decreased from the pupal to the adult stage, and with a slope highly significantly greater than 1 (Fig. 2C; T32 = 14.63; p < 0.0001), supporting that this decrease was strongest for small males.

95% confidence intervals for intercepts significantly different than zero were all 1.8 × 10-6 ≤ y ≤ 0.00040.

These two species had Y-intercepts significantly different from zero, suggesting high occupancy even when treeholes contained little or no water.

An exposure-by-sex interaction for the y-intercept [ F 2,17)=11.41; p=0.0007], with the low-dose females and the high-dose male and female y-intercepts significantly lower than intercepts for the same-sex controls, indicated fewer first-choice errors at the beginning of the task (p=0.007, p=0.01, and p <0.0001, respectively).