interactions with

USAGE SUMMARY

"interactions with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to general relations or communications between two or more people. Example: We discussed several different topics in our interactions with one another.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Various interactions with Kislyak.

The Washington Post

Trump's interactions with Comey.

The Washington Post

But his interactions with singers have deepened.

The New York Times - Arts

"Minimize interactions with policy wonks and lawyers.

The New York Times - Books

Harroun had other interactions with the F.B.I.

The New Yorker

We also have new interactions with others.

The New York Times

Candida interactions with bacterial biofilms.

Nature

Many addressed my interactions with others.

The New York Times

Scalia's interactions with lawyers are notoriously aggressive.

The New Yorker

Almost every scenario includes interactions with Afghans.

The New York Times

In all of my interactions with U.S.F.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the nature of relationships between people, systems, or entities, ensure the noun preceding "interactions with" accurately reflects the context (e.g., "customer interactions with the website").

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "interactions with" when a more specific term would provide greater clarity. For example, "meetings with clients" might be more appropriate than "interactions with clients" if the context involves formal meetings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interactions with" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, describing the nature of the relationship or communication between entities. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is usable in written English, and examples show it used to describe various forms of engagement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

23%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Academia

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "interactions with" is a versatile and widely used prepositional phrase that effectively describes relationships or communications between entities. As confirmed by Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and applicable across various contexts, though more specific language may sometimes be preferable for enhanced clarity. The phrase appears most frequently in news and media, scientific, and formal business contexts. While "interactions with" serves as a general term, consider alternatives like "engagements with" or "discussions with" to achieve greater precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

engagements with

Focuses on active participation or involvement rather than general contact.

interchanges with

Highlights the reciprocal exchange of information or actions.

discussions with

Specifically emphasizes verbal exchanges and conversations.

relationships with

Highlights a deeper or more sustained connection than simple contact.

connections with

Suggests a link or association, possibly without direct communication.

communications with

Stresses the act of conveying information.

relations with

Emphasizes the formal or established nature of the link.

dealings with

Refers to business or formal transactions and conduct.

liaison with

Suggests a coordinating role, typically in a professional setting.

correspondence with

Implies communication through letters or email.

FAQs

How can I use "interactions with" in a sentence?

You can use "interactions with" to describe relationships or communications between entities. For example: "Our verbal interactions with him were sparse".

What are some alternatives to "interactions with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "engagements with", "discussions with", or "relationships with".

Is "interactions with" formal or informal?

The phrase "interactions with" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, for highly formal or business settings, consider more specific alternatives.

Which is correct, "interaction with" or "interactions with"?

While "interaction with" may be appropriate when discussing a single event, "interactions with" is generally preferred when referring to ongoing or repeated communications or relationships.