Sentence examples for interactions were given from inspiring English sources

The TarBase validated interactions were then added to the filtered list and duplicated interactions eliminated (validated interactions were given preference) to avoid overcounting during overrepresentation analyses.

For the clustering, strong interactions were given a weight of 3 while the weakest interactions were given a weight of 1, such that the weak scores were closest to non-interactions, shown in black, and the strongest would be the brightest yellow.

Signatures of these interactions are given by the radio emission.

Furthermore, the efficiency factors concerning whole-plot treatments, subplot treatments and interactions are given.

An overview of mesoscopic models suitable for studying fluid-surface interactions is given.

Results of computational experiments to find the upper critical field and an empirical power law for vortex interactions are given.

An InteroScore, a score accounting for homology, number of orthologues with evidence of interactions, and number of unique observations of interactions, is given to each known and predicted interaction.

The amplitude and velocity relations between solitons and/or solitary waves before and after interactions are given and a possible condition for fission and fusion is proposed.

Best linear unbiased estimators of main effects and two-factor interactions are given explicitly and asymptotic properties of correlations between these estimators are studied as well.

Next, the recently demonstrated formation of UGT homo‐ and heterodimer formation and its functional relevance is discussed and the appropriate methods used to characterize such interactions are given (radiation inactivation, size exclusion chromatography, immunopurification, cross‐linking, two‐hybrid system).

Many good generalized join designs of n runs with resolution IV or more containing many clear two-factor interactions are given for n= 48 up to 192 and n being a multiple of 16.