Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
Martin brought this vision to life by striving for an agile environment at Ormsby Street, an environment that values individuals and interactions over processes and tools.
Through this work we have come to value: Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.
Although such approaches can work for certain applications and may be cheaper, they work badly for complex, shifting tasks.Some of the catch-phrases and jargon of the agile movement—"individuals and interactions over processes and tools" and "customer collaboration over contract negotiation"—are frowned on by more traditional programmers.
If you look at the Agile Manifesto, you'll find the canonical definition of the principles of agile development: –Individuals and interactions over processes and tools.
But to understand this, JargonSpy will walk through the land of "Scrum" and "eXtreme programming" and take a closer look at words like "cowboy coding," "pair programming" and "self-organizing teams". --Individuals and interactioverover processes and tools.
In contrast to plan-driven methods, Agile Manifesto[4] highlights the following: individuals and interactions over processes and tools, working software over comprehensive documentation, customer collaboration over contract negotiation and responding to a change over following a plan.
Similar(52)
People and interactions are valued over processes and tools, and customer collaboration over contract negotiation (Henderson-Sellers & Qumer 2007).
Processes and tools are replaced by individuals and interactions.
Agile projects must have the following characteristics [17]: Processes and tools are replaced by individuals and interactions.
Processes and tools.
We spoke with McDonald over email about their process and tools of choice.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com