The interaction for accuracy (F 2, 54) = .6, P = .55) and response times (F 2, 54) = .58, P = .56) between the Culture of the observer and the Spotlight aperture size factors failed to reach significance.
In [ 42], an extension of logic regression was also proposed to identify SNP interactions explanatory for the disease status, with two measures devised for quantifying the importance of these interactions for the accuracy of disease prediction.
There was no significant group × complexity interaction for response accuracy [ F 2,56) < 1] or latency [ F 2,56) = 2.37, p <.10].
There were significant Drink×Effort interactions for overall memory accuracy but no differential effects for 'remember' or 'know' responses.
These interactions were not present for accuracy (all Fs < 1).
Although the STRING database has information related to known and predicted protein-protein interactions, only known interactions were selected for this analysis, for accuracy.
There was also a significant interaction between group and task for accuracy, F4,86 = 10.293, P < 0.001, but not for reaction time, F4,86 = 2.325, P = 0.063.
Further, they found no interaction between group and emotion for accuracy, and the effects of intensity were similar across the groups.
The lack of RT differences between conditions and also of any main effects or interactions involving the group factor, even for accuracy, suggests that the ERP differences reported below could not have been confounded by task or attentional demands.
For example, we recently developed FpClass (Kotlyar and Jurisica 2006; Kotlyar et al. 2011), an association mining algorithm that greatly expands coverage of the human proteome without increasing false discovery rate: it predicts 178,738 new high-accuracy interactions for 9,372 proteins.
No main or interaction effects of Picture were found for accuracy of responding.
