If j t h configuration during its life time never interact with k t h configuration, then the interaction value of j t h configuration with k t h configuration will be zero, that is, M(I jk ).m jk =0.
Interaction value of C i depends on |S(C i )|, P(C j ), M(I ji ).
After the completion of all interactions, interaction value of each configuration is calculated based on the number of successful interactions.
Fig. 2 System architecture of the proposed work After the completion of all interactions, interaction value of each configuration is calculated based on the number of successful interactions.
where S(C i ) is a set of configurations that invoke interactions with configuration C i. Variable α (0≤α≤1) in Eq. 2, indicate the interactions influence, in terms of interaction value, between C i and C j. Therefore, an interaction value of C i is derived from configurations that have invoked it for interaction.
Given the interaction value of a configuration, values of all eligible fault tolerant schemes (set of redundant configurations which are functionally equivalent, but independent) that are suitable to C t as arguments to Algorithm 1, it selects the most optimal fault tolerant candidate from the set of eligible fault tolerant candidates.
Compute the interaction value of i t h configuration C i, denoted by P(C i ), for i=1 to N, using Pleft(C_{i}right) = frac {1-alpha} {N} + alpha sumlimits_{j in Sleft(C_{i}right)} { P(C_{j}) Mleft(I_{ji}right)} (2).
The reason why we encounter such a high frequency of additive gene action even in the case is either that all the
The rPSC score and the desolvation free energy score of a ligand has only binary states (0 or 1), and the electrostatic interaction value of a grid is calculated as the cumulative sum of the values of all adjacent atoms, thus the calculation order for each atom can be exchanged freely.
