Consistent with "supplies-values fit" framework, the interaction of task interdependence and preference for group work was significantly related to group-member performance.
It also rules out the interaction of TASK-2 pHo-sensors located in different subunits.
Figure 3 depicts the statistical image of the interaction of task by timecourse.
The interaction of Task (speech versus button press) and Stimuli (words versus pictures).
Region selection was thus driven by identifying, from whole-brain analyses, regions showing 1) an interaction of task by timecourse, and/or 2) an interaction of task by lexicality by time.
The FD > 4L comparison, as before, showed a significant main effect of task (F1,12 = 5.6, P = 0.04), and an interaction of task and hemisphere (F1,12 = 9.8, P = 0.009).
However, this effect was only present in the object, but not in the color identification task, interaction of Task × Object, F 1,364) = 22.62, p <.0001, ηp2 =.11.
The reliable interaction of task by lexicality suggested that skilled readers had trouble completely inhibiting lexical (whole-word) processing for words, despite task instructions.
The 8L > 4L comparison showed only an interaction of task and ROI (F3,36 = 15.2, P < 0.001), again with a strong task effect only in the most posterior region.
There was a significant interaction of task and lexicality (regular words vs. pseudowords) (F1,31 = 109.12, P < 0.001; see Supplementary Fig. 3 B ).
