Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(24)
The interaction of stimulus speed and direction of travel was significant in (a) Experiment 1, within-subjects design (n = 77) and (b) between-subjects design (n = 200).
Our results showed a significant interaction of STIMULUS TYPE and PERSPECTIVE with significantly increased activation in right posterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS) for 1PPDYN condition.
Critically, participants' response times showed an interaction of stimulus format and keypad layout: participants were specifically slowed when entering numeric stimuli using a telephone keypad layout.
However, the above models (including the one used here) still require an explicit mechanistic explanation for how the contextual manipulation could influence contrast sensitivity in the manner observed, and the empirical interaction of stimulus area with motion.
As reported earlier for LO, OFA and FFA, we again did not observe a significant main effect of ROI (i.e., effects were similar across the early visual ROIs) and the interaction of stimulus category and orientation was not significant.
No main effect of group or interaction of stimulus category and group were found (all P > 0.11).
Similar(36)
For the summation model, we simply added a parameter for the interaction of stimulus-gender and stimulus-age.
It is attractive because it can directly predict the interactions of stimulus contrast and size, without the need for additional parameters [ 14].
Our model revealed significant main effects of phase and condition, as well as significant interactions of stimulus set used with condition, group with condition and condition by phase (see Table 2 for detailed results of all factors and interactions).
As shown in the figure, the interactions of stimulus concentration, age group, and genetic taste status reveal a heightened degree of increase in perceived intensity for the high concentration stimuli in the older participants (Cohen's d = 0.36, i.e., small) and in supertasters (Cohen's d = 0.61, i.e., medium).
The N2 latency had significant interaction effect of stimulus by diagnosis by age [F (8, 272) = 2.560, p = 0.012].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com