However, an interaction of presentation order of the cueing condition with learning indicated that people who started the tasks with the non-cue version showed significantly better performance in the following cue condition, while participants who started with the cue condition stayed at the same performance level for both versions.
For both correct RTs and accuracy, the three-way interaction of presentation type, sensor, and stimuli and two-way interaction between presentation type and sensor were not significant.
For both correct RTs and accuracy, there was a significant interaction of presentation type and stimuli and a significant interaction of sensor and stimuli with main effects of presentation type and sensor.
We propose a model stating that extraneous cognitive load in hypermedia learning is basically determined by the interaction of text presentation format (linear/non-linear) with text type (text with and without narrative structures).
METHODS: In vitro and in vivo data were tabulated from 125 published papers, including methods, radiation and drug doses, schedules of administration, assays, measures of interaction, presentation and interpretation of data, dosimetry, and conclusions.
Most importantly, the three-way interaction of time, blocked presentation, and Rhyme&Melody was significant, reflecting that the beneficial effect of a blocked presentation in the Rhyme&Melody mode built up over sessions (χ 2 (1) = 8.43, p < 0.01; see also Fig. 2).
The Condition x Time and Presentation x Time interactions were non-significant, F < 1, but there was a significant interaction of Condition x Presentation x Time, F 1, 90) = 4.34, p =.04, partial η =.05.
This fact is also manifested statistically as a main effect for attention (at temporo-parietal sites) with an absence of significant interactions with hemifield of presentation and hemisphere of recording for the P1.
However, there was again a significant interaction of Condition x Presentation x Time, F 1, 90) = 4.14, p =.04, partial η =.04.
Larger amplitudes for congruent trials appeared in the blind group, with no interaction with the side of presentation of the target (lateral: F 1,6) = 6.38, p = 0.04; midline: F 1,6) = 11.39, p = 0.015 2.
More recently, it has also provided an opportunity to modify the interaction and presentation of an antigen/adjuvant to the immune system to better stimulate the desired immune responses for maximal efficacy.
