Our main finding is a significant two-way interaction of condition and item type [ χ 2(4)=11.52 and p =.021].
There was no difference in sentence durations between the three gender-like subclasses and no interaction of condition and gender-like subclass (both Fs < 1.15, p > 0.33).
However, the interaction of condition with generous vs. fair outcome was not significant (β5 = 0.01, t = 0.01, p = .99).99
The interaction of condition and saccade type was not significant.
The overall interaction of condition and time was nonsignificant, F 4, 130.90) = 1.28, p =.28.
However, there was also an interaction of condition and target presence, F 1, 9) = 7.9, p =.02.
The overall interaction of condition and time was nonsignificant, F 4, 113) < 1.
Instead, we found the effect at all serial positions of the target object (no interaction of condition and serial order).
The overall interaction of condition and time was nonsignificant, F 4, 113) < 1 (see Table S1 in the Supplemental Material).
This interaction, along with a two-way interaction of condition with hemisphere, was significant to the α-level of.05 in the majority of infants (16 out of 18).
