Sentence examples for interaction for growth from inspiring English sources

Recent studies underline the importance of the microbial metabolism and host interaction for growth, quality, and health of edible and medicinal plants [17 19].

These observations support the idea that photoperiod may cause the significant GxE interaction for growth if genetic variation in sensitivity to photoperiod exists.

Although no clear role for these nucleases has been identified in yeast mitochondrial RNA degradation, it is notable that nuc1 Δ and rex2 Δ strains show a negative genetic interaction for growth, suggesting some degree of functional overlap (Costanzo et al. 2010).

Thus, using closest markers already associated with QTLs, a two way analysis of variance was conducted to test QTL x E interaction for growth traits at ages 14, 26, 39, 51 and 59 months for P93 and predicted values at the same ages for P97.

This indicates significant G × E interactions for growth rate, which were not revealed when studying body weight due to shared common environment of the fish prior to separation to the different rearing environments.

Although our results obtained through our microcosm system might be different from those from very 'old' contaminated soils, lower nutrient availability might drive the plants to greater dependence upon the beneficial plant-microbe interactions for growth and development in nutrient-poor soils.

Interestingly, some genotype-diet interactions for growth have also been recently demonstrated in European sea bass fed on a plant-based diet [ 27].

The sub-networks from the second search included Tor1 and Pka1 interactions for growth rates of 0.10 h-1 and 0.20 h-1.

Prediction into untested environments remained moderately high for wood (r ≥ 0.61) but dropped significantly for growth (r ≥ 0.24) traits, emphasizing the need to phenotype in all test environments and model genotype-by-environment interactions for growth traits.

One study in a relatively small number of full-sib families estimated heritabilities between 0.075 and 0.14 for length and weight, respectively (Cao et al. 2012), while other studies have shown strong family effects and genotype by environment interactions for growth during the first 2 years of life (Wang et al. 2009a, 2011).

Furthermore, we did not find evidence of treatment interaction according to systolic blood pressure at admission (P value for interaction for haemorrhage growth 0.38).