The aim of the present article is to shed some more light on this issue and describe the complexity of the current collaborative and cross-boundary interactions between governmental and non-governmental actors concerning environmental management, using a case study approach.
The aim of this paper is to critically examine patterns of linking social capital that emerge from the interaction between non-governmental and governmental planning agents.
Those centers, adds John Shine, executive director of the Garvan Institute of Medical Research, "have been very effective in facilitating increased interaction between academic, industrial, and governmental research".
This case study explores the interaction between domestic and foreign governmental policy on technology transfer with the goal of exploring the long-term impacts of technology transfer.
It supports both exploration and exploitation of knowledge through global interaction between universities, industry actors and governmental bodies creating new valuable contacts and new knowledge for reduction of LCOE.
On the one hand, many studies have focused on the interaction between the government and non-governmental organizations during the reconstruction; both the government and non-governmental organizations contributed [ 9, 10] and the reconstruction was successful.
Big data not only provides vital information for rapid and efficient assessment of the effects and impacts of natural and anthropogenic effects, but is also an important boundary object facilitating communication and interaction between the relevant scientific, business, and governmental organizations.
This type of communication currently depends on sporadic informal exchanges between (governmental) agents.
When we distinguish between governmental and non-governmental actors, we can clearly see the importance of the former (Table 3).
In accordance with the reform outlined by the Ministry of Social Affairs, this project promotes partnership between governmental and non-governmental sectors.
