"interaction attention" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the attention given to a particular type of interaction, such as in a classroom or workplace setting. For example: "The teacher gave the students her full interaction attention during the math lesson."
Second, analysis of the correlations among stimulus interaction, attention, and directionality showed that directionality was not an important factor (see Methods).
To ensure this interaction, attention should focus on feedback and reward mechanisms.
In moderate to severe and severe AD, the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) is used to evaluate the severity of cognitive dysfunction across nine cognitive domains, ie, language, memory, praxis, visuospatial ability, social interaction, attention, orientation, construction, and orienting to name.
Although there was no significant effect of Electrode (p =.486), there were significant interactions, namely Attention × Electrode (F = 3.07, p <.05), and there was a significant three-way interaction Attention × Target × Electrode, F = 4.25, p <.05).
To measure stimulus interactions, attention was kept constant by adding drifting Gabors at a third location far outside the receptive field and directing the animal's attention to that location on every trial.
This provides a formal account of the interaction between attention and expectation, where attention optimizes the precision of various processing channels given appropriate cues for expectations.
Just as reading involves several component processes that might serve as points of interaction with attention control, attentional control itself is achieved through the dynamic interaction of several brain systems (Dosenbach et al. 2008; Petersen and Posner 2012).
Apparently, the procedural items are more important to day care patients than to clinical patients, for whom interaction and attention of the professionals were most strongly related with their overall satisfaction [ 32].
In addition, a significant interaction between Attention and Landmark was found (F 1,39) = 8.4, p<0.006), as well as a significant interaction for Attention × Landmark × Group (F 1,39) = 4.7, p<0.04).
No interaction between attention and bottom-up predictability was found, although responses to deviants were in general attenuated when attention was directed away.
While our results cannot directly inform about the interaction between attention and timing per se, we suggest that explicit but not implicit evaluation of emotional speech requires enhanced attention to different cues conveying emotionality (e.g. timing).
