Sentence examples for interacting constraints from inspiring English sources

Fig. 1 Interacting constraints on action and adventure sports participation.

Most design problems have multiple interacting constraints and levels of analysis.

In accordance with dynamical systems theory, which assumes that motor behaviour emerges from interacting constraints (task, organismic, environmental), this study explored the functional role of inter-individual variability in inter-limb coordination.

Here we discuss how a neurobiological system property, degeneracy (i.e., many coordinative structures to achieve one function), can help us understand how skilled individuals functionally adapt perception and action to interacting constraints during performance.

The cornerstones of ED are that (a) movement behaviors are examined and understood at the performer-environment scale of analysis; (b) perception of information provides opportunities for action (i.e., affordances) and is the basis of how behaviours are regulated at an individual level; and (3) performance behaviours are self-organized over time under interacting constraints [34, 52, 53].

We believe our research on water safety is ideally suited to this task due to the diverse range of interacting constraints present and as such provides a tangible example of how this approach can unify different disciplinary perspectives examining an important aspect of sport performance.

By calculating energy contained in a harmonic wave before and after interacting with the constraint, energy transferred at the constraint is quantified in terms of constraint parameters.

For me, fiction has to explore the combinatorial possibilities of people interacting under the constraints imposed by our biology and history.

This focuses the paper on the three primary features of real-life engineering design optimisation problems: multiple objectives, multiple interacting variables and constraints.

In contrast, fully interactive models suggest that syntactic and semantic constraints interact directly and simultaneously with each other at the message-level representation of the input [4] [6].

Both extreme positions ignore the more complex reality that human choices interact with natural constraints.