Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Numerous studies have shown that electronic voting machines are particularly vulnerable to software glitches, intentional vote theft or sabotage.
As you say, "numerous studies have shown that electronic voting machines are particularly vulnerable to software glitches, intentional vote theft or sabotage".
There is no way to be sure that a glitch or intentional vote theft — by malicious software or computer hacking — did not change the outcome.
Aside from intentional vote theft — which is not hard to do on paperless electronic voting machines — glitches are all too common in these machines.
"The decision is also a repudiation of those, including congressional leaders, who facilely assert that intentional vote discrimination no longer occurs and that the protections of pre-clearance are no longer needed".
Similar(55)
There does not need to be intentional discrimination for some voting change to end up weakening hard-won minority voting power, said Prof. Pamela S. Karlan of Stanford Law School.
The game turned in a four-run fifth inning, when Vladimir Guerrero made the Yankees regret the second of three intentional walks to Josh Hamilton, voted the series's most valuable player.
But the decision is also notable for its recognition of an important truth: that a law that makes it harder for minorities to vote can constitute intentional racial discrimination even if it might be primarily motivated by a desire to achieve partisan advantage.
"Whether or not making false claim of U.S. citizen was intentional or not, you nonetheless voted in an election in violation of" the law, his rejection letter said.
Even in states that are not covered by the pre-clearance requirements, the Justice Department has the right to sue to stop intentional — deliberate — attempts to limit voting rights.
Experts say that about one-third of these kinds of votes are often intentional -- protests by voters who do not like any of the candidates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com