Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
In CO, the OHCs and DCs displayed more intensive staining for A20 (m), the OPCs and DCs exhibited more intensive staining for RNF11 (o).
In the cochleae exposed to 0.4 % AgNPs, the SLFs showed more intensive staining that was independent of the cochlear turn, while the SIMCs, SBCs, and capillary endothelial cells (CaECs) demonstrated more intensive staining in the first turn (a c).
In CO, the IPCs and DCs exhibited more intensive staining, but the hair cells (HCs) and OPCs did not (g).
Leather and cloth items too cannot be processed by multimetal deposition because the organic constituents of these materials interact with colloidal gold, resulting in intensive staining of background.
In the cochleae exposed to 0.4 % AgNPs, the SBCs and SLFs exhibited more intensive staining that was independent of the cochlear turn (a c).
In CO, the inner hair cells (IHCs), PCs, and DCs displayed more intensive staining, but the outer hair cells (OHCs) did not (g).
The inner hair cells, pillar cells, and Deiters' cells displayed more intensive staining for TLR4, but the outer hair cells did not (Fig. 2g).
The SBCs, SGCs, and inner pillar cells (IPCs) of CO exhibited intensive staining for RNF11, while the SLFs, hair cells (HCs), and outer pillar cells (OPCs) displayed mild staining for RNF11 (h, l, p).
In the cochleae exposed to dH2O, the spiral ganglion cells (SGCs) showed intensive staining for IL-10 (F), while the pillar cells (PCs) of Corti's organ (CO) demonstrated mild staining for IL-10 (J).
In the cochleae exposed to dH2O, the Deiters' cells (DCs) of Corti's organ (CO) showed intensive staining, while the inner hair cells (IHCs) and inner pillar cells (IPCs) exhibited moderate staining (h).
The strial basal cells, spiral ganglion cells, and inner pillar cells of Corti's organ exhibited intensive staining for RNF11, while the spiral ligament fibrocytes, hair cells, and outer pillar cells displayed mild staining for RNF11 (Fig. 4h, l, p).
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com