Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
The myelosuppressive intensity of grade C chemotherapies that included remission induction therapy for acute leukemia was severe.
It was reported that 'signal intensity of grade 0 cartilage was significantly greater than those of grade 1, grade 2, or grade 3 cartilage'.
The signal intensity of grade 0 was greater at site B than at site E. The echo duration did not differ between the grades and between the sites.
The signal intensity of grade 0 cartilage was significantly greater than the intensities of grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3 cartilage (P < 0.001).
The signal intensity of grade 0 cartilage was significantly greater than the intensities of grade 1, grade 2 or grade 3 cartilage.
The myelosuppressive intensity of grade B chemotherapies that included many different regimens (e.g. consolidation regimens for leukemia; CHOP, ABVD and ESHAP for malignant lymphoma) was moderate.
Similar(50)
Because the low signal intensities of grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 cartilage (48%, 43% and 30% of that of grade 0 cartilage, respectively) decreased earlier with a shorter time than that of grade 0 cartilage, detection of irregularity of grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 cartilage using echo duration might be limited.
The signal intensities of grade 0 cartilage at site A (n = 11), site B (n = 11) and site E (n = 11) were 1.51 ± 0.905, 2.67 ± 2.369 and 1.00 ± 0.540, respectively; the signal intensity was greater at site B than at site E (P < 0.05).
According to this scale, the grade of cumulative neuropathy depends on the duration and intensity of symptoms (grade 1: paraesthesia, dysesthesia of short duration; grade 2: paraesthesia, dysesthesia persisting between cycles; grade 3: paraesthesia, dysesthesia causing functional impairment).
Changes of the traditional screen structure is shown, the use of them increases the screening process efficiency and passage intensity of lower grade of bulk material to the sieve.
The percentage of positively labelled cells (0 100%) in each section was multiplied by the intensity of labelling, graded from 0 (no labelling) to 3 (intense labelling), providing a score between 0 and 300.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com