Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
At CECT, we conduct an extensive diagnostic assessment in order to systematically evaluate your concerns and the intensity of distress your child is experiencing, as well as the impairing effects the distress has for your child in school, in the community, and within the family.
The amount of distress and intensity of distress items are negatively associated with grandiosity.
The items for delusions are: amount of preoccupation, duration of preoccupation, conviction, amount of distress, intensity of distress and disruption of life.
The P5 grandiosity item of the PANSS was significantly negatively correlated with the amount of distress and intensity of distress items of the PSYRATS delusions scale.
Duration, amount of distress, and intensity of distress items were correlated at the.05 level with the P3 hallucination item of the PANSS (see Table 3).
Amount of preoccupation was correlated with the duration of preoccupation (0.47) and disruption to life (0.45); duration of preoccupation with disruption to life (0.42); amount of distress with intensity of distress (0.57).
Similar(48)
The items of MDS-R were categorized according to Likert scale from zero (never) to 4 (often) to assess the frequency of moral distress and from zero (none) to 4 (largely) to assess the intensity of moral distress, which can range from 0 to 16, where the items that are less distressing have low "f" × "i" scores versus more distressing items, which have higher "f" × "i" scores.
"We [only] act strangely when we are at an 8, 9, or 10 in terms of the intensity of your distress," Whiteside says.
At the time, I didn't understand the wisdom of those teachings because I hadn't lived through the intensity of such distress.
This is one of the most widely used measures of intensity of subjective distress.
Others, that we have already mentioned, recommend the use of the global scale to assess the intensity of emotional distress (e.g. [ 5, 7, 13- 16]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com