Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Clinicians view frequency as the more pertinent index of severity, whereas patients consider intensity of bother to be of greater salience.
Similar(59)
Consequently, instead of deleting either the 'intensity of bother' or 'frequency of bother' items, they were combined in the scoring.
The 'intensity of bother' and 'frequency of bother' items were summed, not multiplied because known-group validity testing indicated superior discriminative ability for combining the items by summation rather than multiplication.
"Not a bit of bother".
To determine the association of bother from sexual problems with subjective well- being.
It was a lot of bother.
High correlations between the symptoms 'intensity of bother' items (items 6 10) and their corresponding 'frequency' items (items 1 5) suggest redundancy.
Altogether, it is a lot of bother.
electrical stimulation is a lot of bother.
Re-analysis demonstrated that all thresholds were now correctly ordered, producing scales with three categories (0 = no bother, 1 = little bother, 2 = a lot of bother).
If experienced, the amount of bother from the symptom is rated from not at all bothered (0) to very much bothered (3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com