Sentence examples for intensity interactions from inspiring English sources

Analysis was conducted by year, using pasture × grazing intensity interactions as the random effects, grazing intensity, pasture, year and all possible interactions were treated as fixed effects, and date as a repeated measure.

Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess group by stimulus intensity interactions.

These new materials show low intensity interactions with non-fluorinated organic compounds, and they are inert both chemically and biologically.

For Group B the treatment × prepulse ANOVA showed no significant main effect of treatment group or treatment × prepulse intensity interactions.

The two panels rated attribute intensities similarly, apart from chewiness where a significant Panel × Intensity interaction (P < 0.05) was observed.

However, this significance did not remain when considering the interaction between time of withdrawal and groups (headache intensity, interaction days-group effects: p = 0.508, F = 0.91).

According to the intention-to-treat analysis, withdrawal headache intensity decreased significantly after withdrawal with significant differences among the three groups (headache intensity, days-effect: p < 0.001, F = 10.00; group effect: p = 0.002, F = 6.17) without differences when considering their interaction (headache intensity, interaction days-group effects: p = 0.508, F = 0.91).

In addition, there was a Tone Frequency×Intensity interaction in both hit rate (F 2,16) = 8.48, p<0.005) and RT (F 2,16) = 4.74, p<0.05) due to greater intensity-related improvements for low- and mid-frequency tones compared with high-frequency tones.

Finally, participants' rating of trait intensity was significantly different for different traits [trait × stimulus trait intensity interaction: F(12, 108) = 10.10, p <.001, ηp =.53].

To clarify further the anxiety group × emotion intensity interaction, the groups were compared on their bias scores at each level of intensity (averaged across angry and fearful faces).

For females, the three-way ANCOVA (Ofil1 and Ofil2) for repeated measures revealed a significant Ofil2 vs. prepulse intensity interaction (F 2,64) = 6.02; p < 0.004).