Sentence examples for intelligible condition from inspiring English sources

For each participant, each sentence occurred once in an intelligible condition (16 or 4 channel) and once in an unintelligible condition (4 channel rotated or 1 channel).

As the intelligible condition was also degraded, these findings may be more informative in understanding the neural systems underlying effortful speech comprehension than speech comprehension more generally.

In studies using these stimuli, we have found robust activation in the anterior and posterior temporal cortices when responses to the (mostly) intelligible condition were compared with the unintelligible condition (McGettigan and Evans et al. 2012; Rosen et al. 2011).

As all the values were positive, this could be achieved by 1 of 2 mechanisms, either (1) the average response pattern for the intelligible condition at a particular voxel was positive and the weight vector value at that location was also positive or (2) the average response pattern at a particular voxel was negative and the weight vector value was also negative.

Sometimes the unintelligibility of abstract objects is linked to their lack of clear and intelligible conditions of identity.

But it is not the abstractness of abstract objects that makes them lack clear identity conditions, since some abstract objects, like sets, have clear and intelligible conditions of identity.

Note that Quine thought that the relativity of eternal sentences to languages turned them problematic in a way similar to propositions, for Quine thought that the notion of language has no clear and intelligible conditions of identity, and this is what he found problematic about propositions (Quine 1969, 142).

An idealized intelligibility response would be described by a region that responded equivalently and positively to the 2 intelligible conditions (clear and NV), and equivalently (and negatively) to the 2 unintelligible conditions (rot and rotNV).

The interaction was driven by a relative deactivation to rotNV; in other words, there was no evidence that the intelligible conditions (NV and clear) differed from one another, but the unintelligible conditions (rot and rotNV) differed from one another dependent on the level of spectral detail.

In our study, both left and right auditory cortices show above-chance coherence with the amplitude envelope of vocoded speech, but it is only in the left hemisphere that coherence is enhanced for intelligible speech conditions.

These behavioral results also suggest that the largest difference in phase locking will be seen between the fully intelligible 16 channel condition and 1 of the unintelligible control conditions.