Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
If you don't want intelligibility, what do you want instead?
Similar(59)
Each such transformation is a revolution in human patterns of intelligibility, so what is appropriated in the event is Dasein and thus the human capacity for taking-as (see e.g., Contributions 271: 343).
Because Forms are the grounds of intelligibility, they are what the intellect must grasp in the process of understanding.
5. For Heidegger, the historical transformation of intelligibility (or "history of being") proceeds via what we would now call a "punctuated equilibrium"—through five different Western "epochs" or historical constellations of intelligibility: the Presocratic, Platonic, Medieval, Modern, and late-Modern epochs.
Libertarianism is vulnerable to what is called the "intelligibility" objection.
That would leave in place worries about the intelligibility of possible disconnection between thought about what is right etc. and thought about what to do.
We then proceed to investigate three important questions within this framework: (1) Given a language L, what language L′ maximizes mutual intelligibility with L? We find surprisingly that L′ need not be the same as L and we present algorithms for approximating L′ arbitrarily well.
What concerns us is the speech intelligibility since the objective is to convey the secret message to the intended receiver.
Granted, mutual intelligibility is not the only criteria for determining what a language is.
Locke believes that the key to intelligibility and understanding lies in a proper appreciation of what our faculty of Reason can accomplish when set to work on the ideas received in our experience.
It was assumed that it would be "circular" to explain one concept from this family in terms of others from the same family and that they must instead be explicated in terms of other concepts from outside the modal family concepts that more obviously satisfied (what were taken to be) empiricist standards of intelligibility and testability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com