Sentence examples for intelligibility over from inspiring English sources

Table 1 summarises the results; all models give significantly increased speech intelligibility over the audio-alone case, with the rule-based model yielding the highest intelligibility score.

The amount of intelligibility left over in the encrypted signal is measured by the envelope relevance between the original speech and the processed signal, given as ρ = < E 0, E p > E 0 2 ⋅ E p 2 1 2 (20).

In a recent experiment Al Moubayed et al. [4] it was shown that adding small eyebrow movements on syllables with large pitch movements, resulted in a significant intelligibility improvement over the articulation-only condition, but less so than a condition where manually labelled prominence was used to drive the gestures.

According to Del Re et al. [13], the degree of security (deciphering difficulty) provided by a speech encryption system is related to (1) residual intelligibility (the amount of intelligibility left over in the encrypted signal) and (2) keyspace (the number of keys available for encryption).

Note that we assume that intelligibility includes all stages of comprehension over and above early acoustic processing, and as such the intelligibility responses that we see likely reflect multiple processes including acoustic phonetic, semantic, and syntactic processing, and associated representations.

However, most of the existing approaches for noise estimation suffer from the under-estimation and the over-estimation of noise, which make the intelligibility of speech hard to improve.

The intelligibility score of the proposed method has a significant improvement over the unprocessed speech under all test conditions compared with that of the Multizone approach [21] and ASII approach [22].

Directional microphones have been amply included in hearing aids for over 25 years and have proved to significantly increase speech intelligibility in various noisy environments [7].

These errors could cause over-specification of the absorption required of surface materials, and the inaccurate prediction of acoustic and speech intelligibility related parameters.

As do other concessions to intelligibility.

Here's hoping the words aren't slurred beyond intelligibility.