If you're looking at it from the standpoint of an intelligent intelligence agency, absolutely not.
Intelligent agency requires some ability to predict the future.
He fails to explain how an abstraction like craftsmanship can be capable of intelligent agency.
The functional complexity of living organisms is far greater still, it is argued, and, therefore, must present even stronger evidence for the role of intelligent agency.
There was a time when natural processes capable of producing complex biological features were deemed inconceivable, leading to the conclusion that these, like human artifacts, must be the products of intelligent agency (e.g., Paley 1802).
One common meaning of "teleology" commonly encountered in discussions of evolution since Darwin that of externally imposed design by an intelligent agency (demiurge, nature, God) on pre-existing matter— originates in these ancient discussions and is not accurately identified with the Biblical concept of creatio ex nihilo (Carroll 2014 in Sloan et al. 2015).
(p.11 12) Thus, Paley argues, no matter how many generations of watches beget watches (or, by obvious implication, organisms produce offspring or cells generate daughter cells), the specific, irreducible, and purposeful arrangement of watches' inner workings can only be attributed to the action of intelligent agency.
First, the very point of the argument is to establish the fact that there exists an intelligent agency that has the right causal abilities and motivations to bring the existence of a universe capable of sustaining life.
Second, and more obviously, we do not have any past experience with the genesis of worlds and are hence not in a position to know whether the existence of fine-tuned universes are usually explained by the deliberate agency of some intelligent agency.
