From that perspective, I think Mr Smith's concerns about the injustice of treating humans as persons while conscious artificial intelligences are treated as slaves is insufficiently pessimistic.
Like the readers of 1930s newspapers, speculators "devote [their] intelligences to anticipating what average opinion expects average opinion to be".How much easier the contest would be if some widely watched, widely respected authority figure offered his public judgment on the faces in the photographs, telling readers whom he deemed the prettiest.
Though the phenomenon is older, the whole fad really took off in 1983 with Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences.
A Harvard professor wrote of the "seven kinds of intelligences" in children drawn upon in the show.
Does biography ever illuminate, let alone explain, a thinker's ideas?Mr Menand, a frequent magazine writer as well as a professor of English, zestfully adopts the contemporary biographical practice of not treating thinkers as disembodied intelligences.
He proposed that we have "a multitude of intelligences"—for example, linguistic, mathematical, musical, spatial and interpersonal.
Others are combining human and artificial intelligences.
These are the intelligences.
More specifically, it is the tenth and lowest of the incorporeal Intelligences in the philosopher's cosmology, which presides over the sub-lunar sphere and all it contains.
In the economy of the Aristotelian system, according to Pomponazzi, God and the Intelligences are sufficient to explain sublunary processes and heavenly motions.
All the more so because Alyngton seems to accept the thesis that (angelic) intelligences are not pure forms existing by themselves, but formal principles necessarily joined to the matter of the heavens in such a way as to make up living beings (In Cat., cap. de substantia, p. 264).
