Exact(25)
The Stanford-Binet and the Wechsler intelligence scales remain the most popular.
IQ tests as we know them today were developed in the early 1900s, the first being the Stanford-Binet intelligence scales.
The Wechsler intelligence scales were originally developed from earlier intelligence scales by David Wechsler.
Cognitive functioning of individuals with autistic disorder was assessed using the age-appropriate Wechsler intelligence scales (WPPSI-R, WISC-R, WAIS-R) and the Kaufman K-ABC [55].
Cognitive functioning of autistic individuals was assessed by two psychologists using the age-appropriate Wechsler intelligence scales (WPPSI-R, WISC-R, WAIS-R) and the Kaufman K-ABC [31].
The mean value for all intelligence scales was 100 and the standard deviation 15.
Similar(33)
IQ was measured with the WISC-III-R (Wechsler Intelligence Scales for children) [Wechsler, 1991] or the WAIS-III-R (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) [Wechsler, 1997] when appropriate (for children aged 17 and older).
Results: Individuals requesting DVR services were primarily men (71%), white (82%), single (47%), of low average intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales[ndash ]III full scale IQ score, 84.8), and of limited education (11.8y).
Other batteries that provide reliable estimates of general cognitive functioning include the Stanford-Binet Intelligence ScAbilityifferential Ability Scales, and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children.
In all children, we assessed intelligence using the Wechsler Intelligence Scales (Wechsler, 1967/2002, 2003), autistic symptomatology using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; Constantino, 2005; Constantino & Gruber, 2009), and socioeconomic status using an in-house form (Table 1).
The nonverbal tests were the Picture Completion test from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children 3rd Edition UK (WISC-III-UK; Wechsler 1992) and Conceptual Grouping from the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (McCarthy 1972).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com