Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig"intellectually weak" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe someone or something that is not very strong when it comes to intellectual pursuits or reasoning. For example, "The student performed well in all other subjects, but was intellectually weak in mathematics."
Exact(13)
When I shared my research with Jayne, she said, "I see that your darkness is somewhat useful to you, but it's a bit intellectually weak". This delighted me.
Third, there is a logical fallacy common among elected representatives that, because a particular analysis won't play well to voters, it is an intellectually weak analysis.
When I shared my research with Jayne, she said, "I see that your darkness is somewhat useful to you, but it's a bit intellectually weak".
Only an international inquiry, dare I say an international court, is able to properly consider Blair's role in propping up the intellectually weak US argument for war.
More than a quarter of children under the age of 5 worldwide are permanently "stunted" from malnutrition, leaving them physically and intellectually weak, the United Nations Children's Fund said in a report released Monday.
May's cabinet is actually quite intellectually weak and the big hitters on the left, if rehabilitated, would trounce them, reinvigorating mass public support because they could see that there was a clear choice again.
Similar(47)
In the fields of Middle Eastern studies and political science his work is considered seminal and there is no doubt that both disciplines would be intellectually weaker without it.
It's a harsh conclusion but Pasc concludes that the centre of the UK state is administratively weak and intellectually feeble, at least on the domestic front.
I've rarely seen as intellectually a weak case as the case against the Senate immigration bill".
I don't think that he's weak intellectually.
Mocking the positivist legacy of progress through unity, empiricism and anti-dogmatism, these constraints have been decried as intellectually dogmatic, conceptually weak and methodologically overly restrictive (Feyerabend 1962).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com