Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

intellectual strife

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "intellectual strife" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a conflict or struggle involving ideas, beliefs, or intellectual debates. Example: "The conference was marked by intense intellectual strife as scholars debated the implications of the new theory."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Public disputes between Lefkowitz and Afrocentrist Tony Martin created strife between black and Jewish intellectuals and made Afrocentrism vulnerable to charges of anti-Semitism.

Everywhere in nature one sees strife, conflict, and inarticulate impulse; and these, rather than rational processes or intellectual clarity, are humankind's true points of contact with ultimate reality.

But Fateh didn't view such caution with an eye of understanding or prudence, and he gave up his intellectual subtlety as he sharpened his criticisms of the religious; he once nearly caused civil strife between religious and nonreligious people over a matter of tremendous legal importance, which the secularists found odd and worthy of derision.

News & Media

Vice

Was strife, life?

News & Media

The New Yorker

But the strife has continued.

News & Media

The Economist

Political strife is unceasing.

News & Media

The New York Times

Not all is strife.

Cross-generational strife?

End religious strife?

News & Media

The New York Times

Debate is not strife.

News & Media

The New York Times

There was strife.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "intellectual strife", ensure the context involves a genuine conflict of ideas, not merely a difference of opinion. The phrase implies a significant and potentially disruptive disagreement.

Common error

Avoid using "intellectual strife" to describe minor disagreements or debates. The phrase carries a strong connotation of conflict and can be an overstatement if applied to trivial matters.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "intellectual strife" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to a state of conflict or discord arising from differing intellectual perspectives or ideologies. While there are no exact matches in Ludwig, the similar examples show the phrase relating to disagreements between groups or individuals.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Science

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "intellectual strife" describes a state of conflict arising from differing intellectual perspectives. Ludwig AI considers the phrase grammatically correct and usable, though examples are limited. While the phrase's register is generally neutral to formal, it's important to consider the intensity of the disagreement before using it, as it implies a significant and potentially disruptive conflict. Alternatives like "intellectual conflict" or "clash of ideas" may be more appropriate for milder disagreements. Using this phrase effectively requires awareness of its implications and careful consideration of the context.

FAQs

How can I accurately describe a situation involving intellectual disagreement?

Consider the intensity of the disagreement. "Intellectual conflict" or "clash of ideas" might be more appropriate if the situation doesn't involve significant animosity or disruption. The phrase "intellectual strife" suggests a deeper, more troubled disagreement.

What is the difference between "intellectual strife" and "academic debate"?

"Academic debate" typically refers to a structured discussion with established rules and procedures, whereas "intellectual strife" suggests a more unstructured, potentially disruptive conflict that may not be confined to formal settings. "Intellectual strife" emphasizes the discord and potential negative consequences of the disagreement.

Is "intellectual strife" always negative?

While "intellectual strife" often carries negative connotations due to the word "strife", it can sometimes be a catalyst for intellectual growth and progress. However, it usually implies tension and difficulty. Whether it's viewed positively or negatively depends largely on the specific context and the outcomes of the conflict.

What are some contexts where I might encounter "intellectual strife"?

You might encounter "intellectual strife" in academic circles, political discussions, philosophical debates, or within organizations where conflicting ideologies or intellectual viewpoints clash. Any situation involving deep-seated disagreements over ideas or beliefs can potentially lead to "intellectual strife".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: