intellectual argument

USAGE SUMMARY

"intellectual argument" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe a debate or discussion that is based on logical reasoning, critical thinking, and scholarly perspective. It can be used in a variety of contexts, such as academic essays, political discourse, and philosophical debates. Example: The author presents a compelling intellectual argument in their book, challenging traditional beliefs about the role of technology in society.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

But that's an intellectual argument.

The New York Times

Neither side has won the intellectual argument.

The Economist

This remains the intellectual argument against insurance today.

The New York Times

She was not even willing to follow the intellectual argument.

Independent

It lacks the smack of conflict and avoids intellectual argument".

The Guardian

Or are they – like Pope Francis – simply allowing more space for intellectual argument over doctrinal certainty?

Independent

That's fine, that's their perspective, there's a perfectly coherent, intellectual argument to support that.

The New York Times

But this passion on the right is not being translated into any coherent intellectual argument.

The Economist

"So I had sympathy for the Assange intellectual argument, but not sympathy for the implementation".

The Guardian - Tech

"I would say that we are winning the intellectual argument in Britain," he says.

The New York Times - Magazine

The merits of individual accounts are indisputable, and the intellectual argument for reform is compelling.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When constructing an "intellectual argument", ensure that your claims are supported by credible evidence and logical reasoning. Clearly define your terms and address potential counterarguments.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on emotional appeals or personal opinions when presenting an "intellectual argument". Ensure your argument is grounded in evidence and rational analysis to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "intellectual argument" functions primarily as a noun phrase, typically acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes a type of discussion or debate characterized by logical reasoning and scholarly analysis. As indicated by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Science

8%

Reference

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "intellectual argument" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term for describing discussions and debates based on logic and evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it functions as a noun phrase, often appearing in formal contexts such as news, business, and encyclopedic sources. While alternatives like "reasoned debate" or "rational discourse" exist, "intellectual argument" is direct and widely understood. When using this phrase, prioritize evidence-based claims and logical reasoning to maintain clarity and credibility. Avoid relying solely on emotions, as this undermines the very essence of an "intellectual argument".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rational discourse

Highlights the use of reason and logic in the exchange of ideas.

reasoned debate

Emphasizes the structured and logical aspect of the discussion.

philosophical discussion

Specifies that the argument is rooted in philosophical principles.

thoughtful analysis

Emphasizes the careful and considered examination of the subject.

logical reasoning

Concentrates on the process of constructing a coherent and defensible position.

well-supported thesis

Stresses the depth and breadth of the backing for the central idea.

scholarly dispute

Focuses on the academic and well-researched nature of the disagreement.

substantiated opinion

Focuses on the validity and support behind a particular viewpoint.

evidence-based claim

Highlights the importance of empirical support for the assertion.

cognitive contention

Draws attention to the mental processes and conflicting viewpoints involved.

FAQs

How can I effectively present an "intellectual argument"?

To present an "intellectual argument" effectively, ensure your claims are well-supported by evidence, logical reasoning, and clearly defined terms. Address potential counterarguments and maintain a respectful tone.

What are some alternatives to saying "intellectual argument"?

You can use alternatives like "reasoned debate", "rational discourse", or "scholarly dispute" depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between an "intellectual argument" and a regular argument?

An "intellectual argument" typically involves a structured, evidence-based approach, relying on logical reasoning and critical thinking. A regular argument may rely more on emotions or personal opinions.

In what contexts is the phrase "intellectual argument" most appropriate?

The phrase "intellectual argument" is most appropriate in formal settings such as academic writing, philosophical discussions, or political debates, where reasoned and evidence-based discourse is valued.