Total dry matter intake and forage intake were not different between treatments (P≥0.10).
Live weight gain and DM intake were not affected (P>0.10) by diet.
Total DMI and forage intake were not affected by harvest maturity, feeding frequency, or the interaction (P ≥ 0.41).
Enteric CH4 emissions (g/d) and CH4 energy losses (as a proportion of GE intake) were not changed by including incremental levels of eugenol in the diet.
Riboflavin and niacin DF and ARS, expressed as total daily amount or per unit of dry matter intake, were not affected by FS, but increasing the proportion of UFA decreased riboflavin and niacin DF and ARS.
Exercise capacity and calorie intake were not significantly related to Δvisceral adipose tissue area, while Δsteps per day was significantly correlated with Δvisceral adipose tissue area (Δvisceral adipose tissue area=−21.363−0.004Δ steps per day, r2=0.184, P=0.0326).
The compensatory eating measure showed that reductions in energy intake were not compensated for at the next meal, highlighting that these texture interventions could be used to reduce overall daily energy intake.
mRNA levels of Agrp, Pomc and Npy, ARC-expressed genes classically associated with the control of food intake, were not affected by the manipulation of Fto expression.
There were few direct measures of dietary folate intake in the studies available, so stratified analyses according to folate intake were not possible.
High levels of reported alcohol intake were not common in this population, and volunteers with jaundice or laboratory evidence of chronic hepatitis B or C were excluded from enrollment and analysis.
Beef and capsicum intake were not different in these individuals.
