Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Our findings are also consistent with those of Wu et al. (2007), who found that total meat intake (poultry plus red meat) was a significant determinant of penta-BDE congeners in breast milk collected from 46 first-time mothers in Massachusetts.
Similar(59)
The small variation in intake of poultry may explain why an association between intake of poultry and risk of type 2 diabetes was not found in the total population.
Also, cumulative average of premenopausal intake of poultry was associated with a lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: each additional serving/day of poultry was associated with a 25% lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (relative risk 0.75, 0.58 to 0.98).
Intake of poultry and red meat contributed significantly to PBDE body burden in the U.S. [ 66].
Intake of poultry was not associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (RR>18.0 vs. 0 0.95 [0.74–1.22]; Ptrend = 0.55) (Table 3).
Intake of poultry was not associated with a lower risk of breast cancer in some other prospective studies.
Iron depletion was found to be associated with low intake of poultry and fruits and high consumption of calcium and fast foods.
However, our finding of a positive association with intake of poultry was inconsistent with previous reports in which null (Okochi et al, 1999; McCann et al, 2000) or inverse (Goodman et al, 1997) associations were reported.
In the current study, however, it is not likely that CRP mediates the association between intake of poultry and risk of type 2 diabetes as additional adjustment for CRP did not affect the risk estimates.
Furthermore, there was greater than a 2 to 5-fold higher intake of poultry, eggs, milk and milk products in lactating mothers than in the control group of women (P < 0.0001, Table 3), whether adjusted for the BMI or not.
Results from the 24FR analysis were consistent with this estimate, indicating that 3.3% of subjects reported zero intake of poultry or red meat over the two 24-hr periods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com