Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Only 10% of the fecal particles did not pass through the largest 2.36 mm sieve and 44% passed through the 150 μm sieve, suggesting marked reduction in particle size during the digestive process regardless of original hay intake length.
The following parameters were recorded retrospectively: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), percent vital capacity (%VC), presence of comorbidities, operation time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open surgery, time to first flatus, time to first fluid intake, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications.
For females, only drug use related variables (daily alcohol intake, length of cocaine use and SDS-H and SDS-C) were independently related to global NHP score, explaining also 22.7% of the NHP global score variance.
The results did not support postpyloric feeding in preference to conventional gastric feeding because there were no differences between the two groups in terms of incidence of pneumonia, percentage of caloric goal achieved, total caloric intake, length of stay, or mortality.
Similar(56)
There were no significant differences in caloric intakes, length gain, head circumference gain, feeding intolerance, and incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis.
Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate preoperative calorie intake, postoperative length of stay, durations of ventilation and vasopressor use and body weight gain.
The AGRPPdk1−/− mice showed reductions in food intake, body length, and body weight.
These data suggested that loss of PDK1 in AGRP neurons resulted in reductions in food intake, body length and body weight and increased leptin sensitivity.
Additional file 3: Impact of initial low energy intake on length of hospital stay.
Additional file 2: Impact of initial low energy intake on length of intensive care unit stay.
For women, only other drug related variables (alcohol intake and length of cocaine use) were independently associated with their HRQL.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com