Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Results demonstrated calves fed pelleted starters with MSP had maintained growth performance with less starter intake compared with SBM.
Calves fed AGG had the greatest change in BCS and least starter intake compared with calves fed the other programs.
Groups with small pigs had a lower water intake compared with groups with large or randomly sorted pigs (P<0.01).
The AL diet increased indigestible NDF (iNDF) intake and decreased potentially digestible NDF (pdNDF) intake compared with OG.
More than half (59%) of middle-aged drinkers said they did not want guidance on how to moderate their intake, compared with just over a third (37%) of 18- to 24-year-olds who drink.
Furthermore, the mean body weights (P <.05) and triacylglycerol levels (P <.01) were also significantly reduced after 3 months of BTE intake compared with the baseline levels.
The EC diet decreased eating, ruminating, and total chewing time per unit of forage NDF intake compared with the LC diet.
The results showed that the 19.0% CP diets increased the first and second lactating sow CP intake compared with the 17.5% CP diets (P<0.05).
Cows fed YMPT and SYT had decreased intake of DM, and all supplemented treatments had lower crude protein intake compared with those fed the control.
Intakes of dry matter and crude protein were similar across treatments, whereas ABT and BT diets resulted in decreased fiber intake compared with AHT.
The PA treatments tended to increase feed efficiency (3.5% fat-corrected milk/dry matter intake) compared with CON (1.51 vs. 1.46).
More suggestions(16)
exhaust compared with
ingestion compared with
recruitment compared with
consumption compared with
quantity compared with
absorption compared with
enrolment compared with
incorporation compared with
intake combined with
intake assessed with
feeding compared with
admissions compared with
intake measured with
eating compared with
intake in comparison to
metabolism compared with
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com