According to the audit records, assessment of lifestyle risk factors occurred in the majority of patients ranging from 61.5% of patients having alcohol intake assessed up to 72% for nutrition assessment (Table 3).
The same snack was consumed on 3 subsequent days with energy intake assessed from dietary records.
Dietary GI and GL were calculated for 933 Korean men and women based on dietary intake assessed by food frequency questionnaires and using a GI table developed from published GI databases in a cross-sectional design.
Alcohol intake (assessed by FFQ) was categorized as no intake, low to moderate intake (men≤2 and women≤1 glasses/d), or high intake (men>2 and women>1 glasses/d).
The reproducibility (estimated by 2 repeated measurements) and the relative validity (intake assessed by the FFQ compared to intakes assessed by 12 monthly 24-h recalls) of the FFQ for various food groups and nutrients were assessed among 121 Dutch men and women [28], [29].
On average, the questionnaire covered 91% of the energy intake assessed by the record intake.
Dietary intake, assessed by dietary recall and adipose tissue analysis was also not different.
Total daily energy intake, assessed by 24-h dietary recall, was not significantly different between the groups.
Vitamin D intake assessed by the SFFQ at the 6 mo visit differed significantly between racial groups (p = 0.003).
Before starting Seocalcitol therapy, all patients were seen by a dietitian and the dietary calcium intake assessed.
Finally, dietary cadmium intake assessed using FFQ is not a measure of total cadmium exposure, which also included cadmium exposure from smoking and occupational exposures.
