Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(22)
Major exclusion criteria were insufficient reporting of outcomes, non-English language articles, and ablation strategies that were not prespecified and uniform.
Exclusion criteria included insufficient reporting of outcomes, ablation strategies that were not prespecified and uniform, and a sample size of fewer than 40 patients.
In these papers insufficient reporting of sample sizes was common.
Insufficient reporting of the reporting guidelines enterprise could lead to inappropriate understanding and use.
The findings of this study are however limited due to insufficient reporting of statistics.
However, it might also be due to insufficient reporting of adverse events in clinical trials [ 20].
Similar(38)
Unfortunately, accuracy data for these lesions cannot be extracted from the other studies, because of the low number of patients with polypoid lesions, inconsistent or insufficient reporting on the detection/presence of polyps/adenomas, and/or lack of histological polyp data that impeded any stratification and comparison of results [ 117– 117].
However, limitations of note are that only papers written in English were considered; that no meta-analysis could be performed; that we included studies with insufficient reports of study details; and that none of the studies reported an economic analysis of the costs and benefits of the intervention.
Frequently, trial results are not usable because of bias, which can significantly distort study results, or because of insufficient reporting to determine study quality.
We included 14 cases with unspecified morphology to maximise power and reduce possible bias due to lack of a histological examination or to insufficient reporting, as both of these could be associated with screening history and their inclusion prevents bias.
Risk of bias relating to selection could not be assessed in the remaining 31% of included studies because of insufficient reporting in the publications.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com