Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The sensitivity and PPV of such instruments varied from 33 to 100 and from 16.7 to 72.7%, respectively.
The number of specialized items that were unique to individual instruments varied from as few as 8 items in the PAC to as many as 170 items in the MH.
Response rates for all instruments varied from 59%to83%3% at pre-test and from 57% to 100% at post-test, except for the response rate for reports which was 23% for the experiment group and 33% for the control group (Table 4).
Similar(57)
These instruments vary from general to disease-specific such as Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire CRQQ) [ 2, 3].
The instruments of control and the Intensity of application of these Instruments vary from country to country, depending on what happens to be the principal reason for their Institution.
The resulting instruments varied in size and use from portable organs worn around the neck to large pipe organs.
Each of these scales has been validated, but the patient populations assessed with these instruments have varied from study to study and the extent of the validation efforts have also varied.
The reliability and validity were examined.The Cronbach's alpha for the six instruments varied from.62 to.87.
Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions.
The instruments varied in sensitivity to changes in depressive symptoms.
However, their opinions concerning the use of screening instruments varied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com