Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Adaptability and variability are instruments of evolution, whereas its ontological content is the creation of the stable forms that are resistant not only to extinction but to further evolution as well.
Similar(59)
Researchers peering into the DNA toolbox have found yet another instrument of evolution.
The Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution instrument (Rutledge and Warden 1999) was used to determine participants' acceptance of evolutionary theory.
Questions are from the Material Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument (Rutledge and Sadler 2007).
In order to ascertain student attitudes towards evolution we administered the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument (Rutledge and Warden 1999).
In the "Methods" section, we quantitatively assessed the participant's acceptance using the measure of acceptance of theory of evolution (MATE) instrument.
We also asked students to respond to eight statements from the Material Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument developed and validated by Rutledge and Sadler (2007).
The MATE is a 20-item, 5-point Likert scale instrument that measures students' acceptance of evolution (20 (reject) - 100 (accept)).
College students whose recollections of their high school biology courses included creationism were significantly more likely to invoke creationism-based answers on questions derived from the Material Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument than were students whose recollections of their high school biology courses included evolution but not creationism.
Students' acceptance of evolution, measured by instruments such as the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE; Rutledge and Warden 1999).
And, although many have measured acceptance of evolution via various instruments, there has been little information regarding what students consider to be important factors affecting changes in their positions of acceptance or rejection of evolution.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com