Therefore, 914 (100%) functional instruments were revised, 877 (96.0%) out of them were successfully recalibrated.
Some items within the instruments were revised according to the experts' suggestions.
Some items within the instruments were revised according to experts' suggestions.
Instruments were tested during the intervention pilot, reliability and validity were determined and instruments were revised prior to the main trial intervention.
Following the feasibility study, the data collection instruments were revised and used in a pretest in 2010 to formally evaluate the CATI implementation.
The 24-item instrument was revised from Lee's questionnaire (2010), in which the participants' attitudes, the perceived usefulness of computer-based concept mapping were investigated, and their opinions toward collaborative concept mapping were collected on a five-point scale.
However, despite the instrument's psychometric properties being acceptable, Carvalho and Primi (2015) have recommended the instrument be revised.
After the instrument was revised using feedback from these groups, the next draft of the DSAAI was used by eight education developers and a grant writing consultant (representing two of our target audiences) during a face-to-face workshop in October 2014.
The instrument was revised accordingly.
The instrument was revised based on this feedback.
