Sentence examples for instruments are consistent from inspiring English sources

Differences between instruments are consistent with the SD of the change score, which is smaller in the Item-Improved and IRT-based scales.

COSMIN stipulates that construct validity is the degree to which the scores of health related outcome instruments are consistent with hypotheses formulated prior to data analysis, based on the assumption that the instrument measures the construct of interest [ 27].

Uher et al, using a large sample, found that self-reporting instruments are consistent with clinician-rated methods, and so may be used interchangeably; however, the participants in that study were not elderly.

This distinction between the two instruments is consistent with previous research indicating that condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures tend to be more responsive to change than generic measures [ 36- 38].

This index is sometimes referred to as the modified standardised response mean, or to as the index of responsiveness.[ 16] Internal consistency refers to the extent to which individual items of the instrument are consistent to one another and reflect an underlying scheme or construct.

Principal components factor analysis ascertains whether the underlying factors identified statistically within data collected by a survey instrument are consistent with the theoretical factors one was aiming to measure with the instrument.

Construct validity is the degree to which the scores of an HR-PRO instrument are consistent with hypotheses (for instance with regard to internal relationships, relationships to scores of other instruments, or differences between relevant groups) based on the assumption that the HR-PRO instrument validly measures the construct to be measured [ 5].

The ACT subsample was used to compare construct validity of the Dutch ASCOT with the construct validity of the original English ASCOT, using the following definition of construct validity: the degree to which the scores of an instrument are consistent with hypotheses with regard to relationships to scores of other instruments or differences between relevant groups [ 21].

Internal consistency addresses whether an instrument is consistent across items and is often reported with Cronbach's alpha (for non-binary surveys).

Our instrument is consistent with other efforts to develop paper-and-pencil assessments of PCK (e.g., Park et al. 2008).

Construct validity refers to the degree an instrument is consistent with theory (Coons et al. 2000); this is often achieved through confirmatory and/or exploratory factor analyses (Thompson & Daniel 1996).