Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
The study shows that the DISABKIDS instruments are applicable to a Norwegian childhood diabetes population.
Both instruments are applicable, reliable, valid, and responsive for assessing shoulder symptoms and quality of life in Spanish women with shoulder pain and disability after breast cancer treatment.
We therefore conclude that given this context, all three instruments are applicable for measuring quality of life outcomes in populations of older people in a community setting.
The general instruments are applicable to any population, and are better suited to studies that seek to ascertain the disease's repercussion on HRQL, taking the general population as reference [ 8].
Although generic instruments are applicable to most people irrespective of the type of illnesses by examining a wide range of activities and roles, they may not be sensitive to certain problems that are unique to a particular disease or condition.
Self-rated health instruments are applicable within many cultural, demographic and socioeconomic settings [ 10, 44- 46] and are strong predictors of health care utilization, morbidity and mortality outcomes [ 12- 16, 16, 34, 47].
Similar(52)
Just over half (51%) of included instruments were applicable to adult patients (Table 3).
Few instruments were applicable to settings other than primary care (58%), inpatient facilities (25%), and outpatient specialty care (22%).
Forty-nine percent of instruments were applicable to the general population (not condition-specific); patient condition was not applicable for a further 13% because they focused on health care professionals or systems, not patients.
This instrument is applicable also for standard- and micro-scale measurements, where the sample requirements are 3.2 g and 0.4 g of flour, respectively.
Multigroup CFA substantiated invariant factor loadings and invariant structural models across both samples, hence, supporting that the instrument is applicable in its two versions: English and Spanish.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com