FXA was instrumental in the presentation of results and discussion.
There were no significant differences between the age groups in both clinical presentation and instrumental findings.
This was evidenced by increased instrumental response rates during presentations of an auditory cue previously associated with reward delivery, compared to presentations of a cue not associated with the reward.
Family discussions often prove instrumental for understanding the current presentation.
Instrumental vaginal birth, abnormal fetal presentation and macrocosmic infants are some of the risk factors for serious perineal lacerations during a vaginal birth [ 22, 27- 29].
Qualitative differences in the MHC class II antigen processing and presentation pathway may be instrumental in shaping the CD4+ T cell response directed against tumour cells.
In the second study period, when the incidence of OASIS was reduced, only instrumental delivery and foetal occiput posterior presentation remained significant risk factors for OASIS.
Intrapartum risk factors include fetal presentation, episiotomy (particularly midline), instrumental birth, prolonged second stage of labour, birth position during second stage, and obstetric emergencies such as shoulder dystocia [ 8, 12- 15].
Women were included if they were aged between 18 and 45 years, with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation at delivery and if instrumental extraction was indicated.
But where period-instrument performances usually try to recreate a historic presentation style, this one left it at the instrumental timbres (and, to some degree, the quality of the vocal production).
