Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
After the instrument was revised using feedback from these groups, the next draft of the DSAAI was used by eight education developers and a grant writing consultant (representing two of our target audiences) during a face-to-face workshop in October 2014.
The instrument was revised accordingly.
The instrument was revised based on this feedback.
To suit THC staff, the instrument was revised and tailored to the features of THC workers.
The instrument was revised based on results of the pilot study.
Based on this pre-test, the instrument was revised and reduced from 76 to 56 items.
Similar(50)
However, despite the instrument's psychometric properties being acceptable, Carvalho and Primi (2015) have recommended the instrument be revised.
Although a sensitivity of 100% would be difficult to attain, maintaining the number of missed events at an absolute minimum should be a priority when the instrument is revised or evaluated.
Some items within the instruments were revised according to the experts' suggestions.
Some items within the instruments were revised according to experts' suggestions.
Instruments were tested during the intervention pilot, reliability and validity were determined and instruments were revised prior to the main trial intervention.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com