Sentence examples for instrument standards from inspiring English sources

Mean PTSD scores ≥2.0 were considered significant for meeting symptom criteria of probable PTSD based upon the instrument standards [ 18].

Mean depression scores ≥ 1.75 were considered significant for meeting symptom criteria of depression based upon the instrument standards [ 26].

Mean PTSD scores ≥ 2.0 were considered significant for meeting symptom criteria of PTSD based upon the instrument standards [ 26].

Mean depression scores ≥1.75 were considered significant for meeting symptom criteria of probable depression based upon the instrument standards [ 18].

The quality of reporting of the included studies was assessed by two reviewers independently, using a modified version of the following instrument, Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) [ 16- 18].

The bottom of the clarinet's written range is defined by the keywork on each instrument, standard keywork schemes allowing a low E on the common B clarinet.

Based on the instrument standard PHQ-9 score ≥5 is considered as significant for meeting the symptoms of depression.

Standardised domain quality scores for each guideline were calculated according to the AGREE II instrument standard methods.

Overall process variability as determined by calculating the median RSD for all endogenous metabolites (that is, non-instrument standards) present in 100% of the samples gave a value of 11 12%.

Overall process variability was determined by calculating the median RSD for all endogenous metabolites (non-instrument standards) present in 100% of technical replicates of pooled experimental samples.

Overall process variability was determined by calculating the median relative S.D. for all endogenous metabolites (i.e., non-instrument standards) present in 100% of the matrix samples, which are technical replicates of pooled client samples.