Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Do 'focus on form' and 'focus on forms' instructions equally develop knowledge of formulaic sequences?
Similar(57)
These findings also support the findings obtained in the studies conducted by Rafieyan et al. (2014) and Rafieyan (2017) who found both 'focus on form' and 'focus on forms' methods of instruction equally effective in developing language learners' knowledge of formulaic sequences.
Musicians received brief instructions, rehearsed equally briefly, and then played for as long as felt right.
After the digestion, the digest was desalted using Vydac C18 UltraMicro Tip Column (The Nest Group, Southborough, MA) as per the manufacturer's instructions, divided equally into two tubes, and dried in a SpeedVac.
Multiple studies focused on use of the computer as the medium to deliver instruction and noted that self-directed instruction was equally (or more) effective as instructor-led didactic or interactive instruction and potentially more efficient.
The comparison of language learners' performance in different instruction groups on the discourse completion task revealed that both 'focus on form' and 'focus on forms' methods of instruction were equally effective in developing language learners' knowledge of formulaic sequences.
The multicycle design in principle could be faster, because not all instructions must be equally long.
'Focus on form' and 'focus on forms' instructions do not equally develop knowledge of formulaic sequences.
Therefore, all three null hypotheses of the study which state that there is no significant relationship between knowledge of formulaic sequences and language proficiency, form-focused instruction has no effect on developing knowledge of formulaic sequences, and 'focus on form' and 'focus on forms' instructions do not equally develop knowledge of formulaic sequences are rejected.
In addition, there are reams of pages of instructions that are equally, if not more, complicated.
Instructions and explanations were equally provided to all patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com