Sentence examples for instruction frequency and from inspiring English sources

Using socio-historical constructivist theory to guide instruction interventions, instruction frequency and questioning were intentionally manipulated during one-half of each course.

To assess the relationship between instruction frequency and selective pressure, we compare the instruction frequencies of the terminal taxa for the same set of 4 selective pressures.

Our results indicate a stronger relationship between ASRV and reward structure than between instruction frequencies and reward structures.

Furthermore, there is a significant difference between the no-task reward structure instruction frequencies and the control data instruction frequencies while MP reconstructs both data sets with essentially the same accuracy.

This data suggests that while non-uniform instruction frequencies and non-uniform character substitutions are a significant result of natural selection, they may not explain why natural selection improves the performance of phylogeny reconstruction algorithms such as maximum parsimony in some cases.

We then illustrate how selective pressures cause changes in both ASRV and instruction frequency (which is related to the character substitution model).

We use instruction frequency as a proxy for accepted substitution percentage because instruction frequencies are easier to interpret given the 26 instructions in the Avida instruction set.

Given that the instruction set size is 26, the average instruction frequency should be 3.86%.

We see that for the control data set with no selective pressure, the instruction frequency distribution is essentially uniform at 3.86%.

The instruction frequencies for nand and IO, both of which are critical for performing Boolean logic tasks, are also significantly above 3.86% in the overlapping and non-overlapping reward structure data sets where there is a selective pressure to perform Boolean logic tasks.

To help determine which factor, ASRV or non-uniform accepted substitution probabilities, is the more influential byproduct of natural selection on the performance of maximum parsimony, we plot the ASRV and instruction frequencies that result from a variety of selective pressures.