Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
We instructed panellists to rate all recommendations on a 9-point Likert scale (where one is low and nine is high) according to their perceptions of current practice.
The full questionnaire pack is provided in Additional file 2. We instructed panellists to rate their level of support for each recommendation, according to its desirability and feasibility, by drawing on the information provided and on their own knowledge and experience of MDT meetings in their specialty [ 36].
Similar(58)
The panellists were instructed to rate the presence of any fishy aftertaste on a scale of zero to four, with zero indicating no such aftertaste and four indicating an extremely strong one.
For the purpose of this task, panellists were instructed to think about each potential solution, and in later rounds, the importance and feasibility of each solution, in isolation.
Importantly, in an effort to address questions from an evidenced-based and clinical utility perspective, panellists were specifically instructed not to factor in cost, reimbursement and access as factors in their deliberations, although clearly these are critical factors in decision making for the individual patient.
I did as instructed.
Resume cooking as instructed.
"Ábrelo," she instructed.
"Strip," Arche instructed.
"No pink," Crutchfield instructed.
"Follow me," she instructed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com